Fundamentalist applications of prevention, veto and opposition In the etiquette of research and debate in the chapter on analogy The Extract

Abstract

The study dealt with the foundations of research and debate etiquette and its fundamental applications in the chapter on analogy in the principles of jurisprudence. Where it linked the theoretical foundations and practical applications in managing the dispute between the fundamentalists who adhered to those foundations in a practical and practical reality and appealed to them.

The researcher has linked the abstract theoretical foundations of the science of research and the debate with the practical application of it in the chapter of analogy, which was often mentioned in summary, With the help of using practical applied examples, expounding its issues, referring its branches to its origins, and clarifying the functions of the reasoner and the questioner in veto, prevention and opposition.

The study clarified when the response to the allegation and when it is directed to its premises, and what rules must be taken into account in that, in terms of the use of veto, prevention, opposition, or the opposite or equal to the opposite or the most particular, or the inversion and others based on the law of mental contradiction in proof and negation.